| Previous | Next |
44-50144-501. Employer obligation; burden of proof; defenses; exceptions; legislative intent; benefits reduced for certain retirement benefits. (a) If in any employment to which the workers compensation act applies, personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment is caused to an employee, the employer shall be liable to pay compensation to the employee in accordance with the provisions of the workers compensation act. In proceedings under the workers compensation act, the burden of proof shall be on the claimant to establish the claimant's right to an award of compensation and to prove the various conditions on which the claimant's right depends. In determining whether the claimant has satisfied this burden of proof, the trier of fact shall consider the whole record. (b) Except as provided in the workers compensation act, no employer, or other employee of such employer, shall be liable for any injury for which compensation is recoverable under the workers compensation act nor shall an employer be liable to any third party for any injury or death of an employee which was caused under circumstances creating a legal liability against a third party and for which workers compensation is payable by such employer. (c) The employee shall not be entitled to recover for the aggravation of a preexisting condition, except to the extent that the work-related injury causes increased disability. Any award of compensation shall be reduced by the amount of functional impairment determined to be preexisting. (d) (1) If the injury to the employee results from the employee's deliberate intention to cause such injury; or from the employee's willful failure to use a guard or protection against accident required pursuant to any statute and provided for the employee, or a reasonable and proper guard and protection voluntarily furnished the employee by the employer, any compensation in respect to that injury shall be disallowed.
(2) The employer shall not be
liable under the workers compensation act where the injury, disability or death
was contributed to by the employee's use
or consumption of alcohol or any drugs, chemicals
or any other compounds or substances, including but not limited to,
any drugs or medications which are available to the public without a
prescription from a health care provider, prescription drugs or medications,
any
form or type of narcotic drugs, marijuana, stimulants, depressants or
hallucinogens. In the case of drugs or medications which
are available to
the public without a prescription from a health care provider and prescription
drugs or medications, compensation shall not be denied
if the employee can show that such drugs or medications were being taken or
used in therapeutic doses and there have been no prior incidences of the
employee's impairment on the job as the result of the use of such drugs or
medications within the previous 24 months. It shall be conclusively presumed
that the employee was impaired
due to alcohol or drugs if it is shown that at the time of the injury
that the
employee had an alcohol concentration of .04 or more, or a GCMS
confirmatory
test by quantitative analysis showing a concentration at or above the levels
shown on the following chart for the drugs of abuse listed:
Confirmatory test cutoff levels (ng/ml)
Marijuana metabolite 1.................15
Cocaine metabolite 2.................150
Opiates: Morphine.................2000
Codeine.................2000
6-Acetylmorphine4.................10 ng/ml
Phencyclidine.................25
Amphetamines: Amphetamine.................500
Methamphetamine 3.................500
1 Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid.
2 Benzoylecgonine.
3 Specimen must also contain amphetamine at a concentration greater
than or equal to 200 ng/ml.
4 Test for 6-AM when morphine concentration exceeds 2,000 ng/ml.
An employee's refusal to submit to a chemical test
shall not be admissible evidence to prove impairment unless there was probable
cause to believe that the employee used, possessed or was impaired by a
drug or alcohol while working. The results of a chemical test
shall not be
admissible evidence to prove impairment unless the following conditions were
met:
(A) There was probable cause to believe that the employee used, had
possession of, or was impaired by the drug or alcohol while
working;
(B) the test sample was collected at a time contemporaneous with the
events establishing probable cause;
(C) the collecting and labeling of the test sample was performed by or
under the supervision of a
licensed health care professional;
(D) the test was performed by a laboratory approved by the United States
department of health and human services or licensed by the department of health
and environment, except that a blood sample may be
tested for alcohol content by a laboratory commonly used for that purpose by
state law enforcement agencies;
(E) the test was confirmed by gas
chromatography-mass
spectroscopy or other comparably reliable analytical method, except that no
such confirmation is required for a blood alcohol sample; and
(F) the foundation evidence must establish, beyond a reasonable doubt,
that the test results were from the sample taken from the employee.
(3) For purposes of satisfying the probable cause requirement of
subsection (d)(2)(A) of this section, the employer shall be deemed to have met
their burden of proof on this issue by establishing any of the following
circumstances:
(A) The testing was done as a result of an employer mandated drug testing
policy, in place in writing prior to the date of accident, requiring any worker
to submit to testing for drugs or alcohol if they are involved in an accident
which requires medical attention;
(B) the testing was done in the normal course of medical treatment for
reasons
related to the health and welfare of the injured worker and was not at the
direction of the employer; however, the request for GCMS testing for purposes
of
confirmation, required by subsection (d)(2)(E) of this section, may have been
at the
employer's request;
(C) the worker, prior to the date and time of the accident, gave written
consent to the employer that the worker would voluntarily submit to a chemical
test for drugs or alcohol following any accident requiring the worker to
obtain medical treatment for the injuries suffered. If after suffering an
accident requiring medical treatment, the worker refuses to submit to a
chemical test for drugs or alcohol, this refusal shall be considered evidence
of impairment, however, there must be evidence that the presumed impairment
contributed to the accident as required by this section; or
(D) the testing was done as a result of federal or state law or a federal or
state rule or regulation having the force and effect of law requiring a post
accident testing program and such required program was
properly implemented at the time of testing.
(e) Compensation shall not be paid in case of coronary or coronary artery
disease or cerebrovascular injury unless it is shown that the exertion of the
work necessary to precipitate the disability was more than the employee's usual
work in the course of the employee's regular employment.
(f) Except as provided in the workers compensation act, no construction
design professional who is retained to perform professional services on a
construction project or any employee of a construction design professional who
is assisting or representing the construction design professional in the
performance of professional services on the site of the construction project,
shall be liable for any injury resulting from the employer's failure to comply
with safety standards on the construction project for which compensation is
recoverable under the workers compensation act, unless responsibility for
safety practices is specifically assumed by contract. The immunity provided by
this subsection to any construction design professional shall not apply to the
negligent preparation of design plans or specifications.
(g) It is the intent of the legislature that the workers compensation
act shall be liberally construed for the purpose of bringing employers and
employees within the provisions of the act to provide the protections of
the workers compensation act to both. The provisions of the workers
compensation act shall be applied impartially to both employers and
employees in cases arising thereunder.
(h) If the employee is receiving retirement
benefits under the
federal social security act
or retirement benefits from any other retirement system, program or plan which
is provided by the employer against which the claim is being made, any
compensation benefit payments
which the employee is eligible to
receive under the workers compensation act for such claim shall be reduced by
the weekly equivalent amount of
the total amount of all such retirement benefits,
less any portion of any
such retirement benefit, other than retirement benefits under the federal
social security act, that is attributable to payments or contributions made
by the employee,
but in no event shall the
workers compensation benefit be less than the
workers compensation benefit payable for the employee's
percentage of functional impairment.
History: L. 1927, ch. 232, § 1;
L. 1967, ch. 280, § 1;
L. 1974, ch. 203, § 1;
L. 1975, ch. 258, § 1;
L. 1979, ch. 156, § 1;
L. 1985, ch. 175, § 1;
L. 1987, ch. 187, § 1;
L. 1990, ch. 182, § 1;
L. 1993, ch. 286, § 24;
L. 1996, ch. 79, § 1;
L. 2000, ch. 160, § 5;
L. 2005, ch. 54, § 1; July 1.
|
|



