Find Bill
Find Your Legislator
Legislative Deadlines
Feb. 17, 2018
RSS Feed Permanent URL -A +A

2017 Statute



Prev Article 51. - SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE AIDNext


72-5151. Same; at-risk student weighting; high-density at-risk student weighting; expenditure limitations. (a) The at-risk student weighting of each school district shall be determined by the state board as follows:

(1) Determine the number of at-risk students included in the enrollment of the school district; and

(2) for a school district with an enrollment that consists of 10% or more at-risk students, multiply the number determined under subsection (a)(1) by 0.484. The resulting sum is the at-risk student weighting of the school district; or

(3) for a school district with an enrollment that consists of less than 10% at-risk students, multiply the number of students equal to 10% of such school district's enrollment by 0.484. The resulting sum is the at-risk student weighting of the school district. A school district whose at-risk student weighting is determined pursuant to this paragraph shall submit a report to the state board in such form and manner as required by the state board that identifies those students enrolled in such school district who are receiving at-risk program services and the criteria each such student satisfies in order to receive at-risk program services. The state board shall adopt rules and regulations that establish the criteria for eligibility for at-risk program services. The provisions of this paragraph shall only apply to those school districts that offer instruction in kindergarten and grades one through 12.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (b)(4), the high-density at-risk student weighting of each school district shall be determined by the state board as follows:

(1) (A) If the enrollment of the school district is at least 35% at-risk students, but less than 50% at-risk students:

(i) Subtract 35% from the percentage of at-risk students included in the enrollment of the school district;

(ii) multiply the difference determined under subsection (b)(1)(A)(i) by 0.7; and

(iii) multiply the product determined under subsection (b)(1)(A)(ii) by the number of at-risk students included in the enrollment of the school district; or

(B) if the enrollment of the school district is 50% or more at-risk students, multiply the number of at-risk students included in the enrollment of the school district by 0.105; or

(2) (A) if the enrollment of a school in the school district is at least 35% at-risk students, but less than 50% at-risk students:

(i) Subtract 35% from the percentage of at-risk students included in the enrollment of such school;

(ii) multiply the difference determined under subsection (b)(2)(A)(i) by 0.7; and

(iii) multiply the product determined under subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii) by the number of at-risk students included in the enrollment of such school; or

(B) if the enrollment of a school in the school district is 50% or more at-risk students, multiply the number of at-risk students included in the enrollment of such school by 0.105; and

(C) add the products determined under subsections (b)(2)(A)(iii) and (b)(2)(B) for each such school in the school district, respectively.

(3) The high-density at-risk weighting of the school district shall be the greater of the product determined under subsection (b)(1) or the sum determined under subsection (b)(2)(C).

(4) Commencing in school year 2018-2019, school districts that qualify to receive the high-density at-risk weighting pursuant to this section shall spend any money attributable to the school district's high-density at-risk weighting on the at-risk best practices developed by the state board pursuant to K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 72-5153(d), and amendments thereto. If a school district that qualifies for the high-density at-risk weighting does not spend such money on such best practices, the state board shall notify the school district that it shall either spend such money on such best practices or shall show improvement within five years of notification. Improvement shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (A) The percentage of students at grade level on state math and English language arts assessments; (B) the percentage of students that are college and career ready on state math and English language arts assessments; (C) the average composite ACT score; or (D) the four-year graduation rate. If a school district does not spend such money on such best practices and does not show improvement within five years, the school district shall not qualify to receive the high-density at-risk weighting in the succeeding school year.

(5) The provisions of this subsection shall expire on July 1, 2019.

History: L. 2017, ch. 95, § 23; July 1.



Prev Article 51. - SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE AIDNext
2018. Powered by KLISS. Rendered: 2018-02-17T14:56:44. Head Rev No: 427804